Forge vs Semaphore UI
Why Forge is a great alternative to Semaphore UI
| Feature | Forge | Semaphore UI |
|---|---|---|
| Has FOSS version | ✅ YES | ✅ YES |
| License | ✅ MIT License | ✅ MIT License |
| Ease of setup and maintenance | ✅ YES | ✅ YES |
| Efficient use of CPU and RAM | ✅ YES, written in pure Go | ✅ YES, written in pure Go |
| Can operate without Kubernetes, Docker, Java, etc | ✅ YES, single binary or Docker | ✅ YES, single binary or Docker |
| Docker Support | ✅ YES (optional deployment method) | ⚠️ Unknown |
| Can run Ansible playbooks | ✅ YES | ✅ YES |
| Can run Terraform/OpenTofu code | ✅ YES | ✅ YES |
| Can run Bash scripts | ✅ YES | ✅ YES |
| Support remote runners | ✅ YES | ✅ YES |
| LDAP/AD Authentication | ✅ YES | ✅ YES |
| API Support | ✅ YES, full REST API | ✅ YES, full REST API |
| Built-in Compliance Dashboard | ✅ YES (Project, Task, User reporting) | ❌ NO |
| Built-in STIG Viewer | ✅ YES | ❌ NO |
| IaC Review & Compliance Alignment | ✅ YES (Review, edit, framework alignment) | ❌ NO |
| Compliance Framework Integration | ✅ YES (OpenSCAP, DoD STIGs, CIS, HIPAA) | ❌ NO |
| OOTB Compliance Templates | ✅ YES (DoD STIGs, CIS Benchmark, HIPAA) | ❌ NO |
| Secret Manager Integrations | ✅ YES (Vault, Azure, AWS, GCP) | ⚠️ Limited |
| Infrastructure Code Validator & Editor | ✅ YES | 🤷 Unknown |
| Multiple Database Support | ✅ YES (SQLite, MySQL, PostgreSQL) | ✅ YES |
| Commercial Support Available | ✅ YES | ✅ YES (Semaphore Pro) |
| Terramate Orchestration | ✅ YES (integrated phases 1–6) | 🤷 Unknown |
| Terraformer Integration | ✅ YES | 🤷 Unknown |
| Packer/QEMU Support | ✅ YES (image build & VM test) | 🤷 Unknown |
| Golden Image Catalog | ✅ YES (Packer builds, catalog, Terraform var injection) | 🤷 Unknown |
| Official Docker Images | ✅ Forge & Runners | 🤷 Unknown |
| Golden Image Catalog | ✅ YES (Packer builds, catalog, Terraform var injection) | 🤷 Unknown |
| DoD SCC Integration | ✅ YES | 🤷 Unknown |
| OpenSCAP Remote Runner | ✅ YES | 🤷 Unknown |
| STIG PDF/ZIP Exports | ✅ YES (reports & screenshots) | 🤷 Unknown |
What Makes Digital Data Forge Stand Out?
1. Comprehensive Compliance Suite
Digital Data Forge includes a full compliance suite with unique features not found in Semaphore UI:
- Built-in STIG Viewer: View and analyze Security Technical Implementation Guides directly in the UI
- Compliance Dashboard: Comprehensive reporting with Project, Task, and User-level compliance metrics
- OOTB Compliance Templates: Pre-built automated compliance for DoD STIGs, CIS Benchmarks, and HIPAA
- Framework Integration: Native integration with OpenSCAP and other compliance frameworks
- IaC Compliance Alignment: Review, edit, and align Infrastructure as Code with compliance frameworks
2. Commercial Support Options
Digital Data Forge offers commercial support alongside its open-source community support, giving you the flexibility to choose the support model that fits your organization's needs.
3. Mature Codebase
Built on the proven Semaphore codebase and evolved with additional enterprise features, security enhancements, and improved reliability.
4. Infrastructure Code Validator & Editor
Built-in validator and editor for Infrastructure as Code (Ansible, Terraform, etc.), making it easier to review, validate, and edit your automation code before execution.
5. Flexible Database Options
Supports SQLite (single-node) and MySQL/PostgreSQL for performance, scalability, and high availability.
6. Enterprise Secret Management
Native integrations with leading secret managers including HashiCorp Vault, Ansible Vault, Azure Key Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, and GCP Secret Manager for secure credential management.
7. Security-First Design
With built-in features like file security controls, rate limiting, security headers, and comprehensive audit logging, designed for secure enterprise deployments.
Bottom Line: Both Digital Data Forge and Semaphore UI are excellent choices built on Go with similar architectures. Both offer commercial support options. Choose Digital Data Forge if you need:
- Built-in STIG Viewer for DoD compliance
- Comprehensive Compliance Dashboard with Project, Task, and User reporting
- IaC review and compliance framework alignment
- OOTB compliance templates for DoD STIGs, CIS Benchmarks, and HIPAA
- Enterprise secret manager integrations (Vault, Azure, AWS, GCP)
Choose Semaphore UI if you prefer Semaphore Pro's specific support model and don't need advanced compliance features.
Forge vs Ansible Tower/AWX
Why Forge is better than Tower/AWX for most teams
| Feature | Forge | Tower/AWX |
|---|---|---|
| Has FOSS version | ✅ YES | ✅ YES (AWX) |
| License | ✅ MIT License | ⚠️ Apache 2.0 (AWX) / Commercial (Tower) |
| Ease of setup and maintenance | ✅ YES - single binary or Docker | ❌ NO - complex Kubernetes deployment |
| Efficient use of CPU and RAM | ✅ YES, written in pure Go | ❌ NO, requires multiple containers |
| Can operate without Kubernetes, Docker, Java, etc | ✅ YES, single binary or Docker | ❌ NO, requires Kubernetes/Docker |
| Can run Ansible playbooks | ✅ YES | ✅ YES |
| Can run Terraform/OpenTofu code | ✅ YES | ❌ NO (Ansible only) |
| Can run Bash scripts | ✅ YES | ⚠️ Limited |
| Support remote runners | ✅ YES | ✅ YES (Execution nodes) |
| RBAC (Role-Based Access Control) | ✅ YES | ✅ YES (more complex) |
| Installation time | ✅ 5 minutes | ❌ Hours to days |
| Terramate Orchestration | ✅ YES (integrated phases 1–6) | 🤷 Unknown |
| Terraformer Integration | ✅ YES | 🤷 Unknown |
| Packer/QEMU Support | ✅ YES (image build & VM test) | 🤷 Unknown |
| Official Docker Images | ✅ Forge & Runners | 🤷 Unknown |
| DoD SCC Integration | ✅ YES | 🤷 Unknown |
| OpenSCAP Remote Runner | ✅ YES | 🤷 Unknown |
| STIG PDF/ZIP Exports | ✅ YES (reports & screenshots) | 🤷 Unknown |
Why Choose Forge Over Tower/AWX?
1. Dramatically Simpler Setup
Tower/AWX requires a complex Kubernetes deployment with multiple pods, persistent volumes, and external databases. Forge is a single binary that runs anywhere - download and run, or use Docker for containerized deployments. Setup takes minutes, not hours or days.
2. Lower Resource Requirements
AWX typically requires 4GB+ RAM and multiple CPU cores just for the control plane. Forge can run comfortably on 512MB RAM, making it perfect for edge deployments, small teams, or cost-conscious organizations.
3. No Vendor Lock-in
Ansible Tower is expensive (per-node licensing) and ties you to Red Hat's ecosystem. Forge is MIT licensed - use it however you want, forever, for free.
4. Multi-Tool Support
While Tower/AWX only runs Ansible, Forge supports Ansible, Terraform, OpenTofu, Bash scripts, and more. One tool for all your automation needs.
5. Modern Architecture
Forge is built with modern Go, providing excellent performance and low memory footprint. AWX uses Python and Django, which are heavier and slower.
6. Compliance Built-in
Forge includes native OpenSCAP and SCC compliance scanning - no additional configuration or tools needed.
Perfect for: Small to medium teams, edge deployments, cost-conscious organizations, multi-tool automation needs, and anyone who values simplicity over enterprise complexity.
Forge vs Rundeck
Why Forge is better than Rundeck
| Feature | Forge | Rundeck |
|---|---|---|
| Has FOSS version | ✅ YES | ✅ YES |
| Ease of setup and maintenance | ✅ YES | ❌ NO |
| Efficient use of CPU and RAM | ✅ YES, written in pure Go | ❌ NO, written in Java |
| Can operate without Kubernetes, Docker, Java, etc | ✅ YES, single binary or Docker | ❌ NO, requires Java |
| Can run Ansible playbooks | ✅ YES (native support) | ⚠️ Via plugins |
| Can run Terraform/OpenTofu code | ✅ YES | ⚠️ Via plugins |
| Can run Bash scripts | ✅ YES | ✅ YES |
| Support remote runners | ✅ YES | ✅ YES |
| Modern UI | ✅ YES (Vue.js) | ⚠️ Dated interface |
| Startup time | ✅ Seconds | ❌ Minutes (JVM) |
| Memory footprint | ✅ ~50-200MB | ❌ ~500MB-2GB+ |
| Terramate Orchestration | ✅ YES (integrated phases 1–6) | 🤷 Unknown |
| Terraformer Integration | ✅ YES | 🤷 Unknown |
| Packer/QEMU Support | ✅ YES (image build & VM test) | 🤷 Unknown |
| Official Docker Images | ✅ Forge & Runners | 🤷 Unknown |
| DoD SCC Integration | ✅ YES | 🤷 Unknown |
| OpenSCAP Remote Runner | ✅ YES | 🤷 Unknown |
| STIG PDF/ZIP Exports | ✅ YES (reports & screenshots) | 🤷 Unknown |
Why Choose Forge Over Rundeck?
1. No Java Required
Rundeck requires Java Runtime Environment (JRE), which adds complexity, memory overhead, and longer startup times. Forge is a single, self-contained binary with no dependencies.
2. Native Ansible & Terraform Support
Forge has first-class support for Ansible playbooks and Terraform modules built-in. Rundeck requires plugins and additional configuration for proper IaC support.
3. Modern Technology Stack
Forge uses Go (backend) and Vue.js (frontend) for a responsive, modern experience. Rundeck's Java/Grails stack feels dated and is heavier on resources.
4. Better Performance
Go's compiled nature and efficient memory management means Forge starts instantly and uses far less RAM than Rundeck's JVM-based architecture.
5. Simpler Configuration
Rundeck's XML-based job definitions and complex plugin system can be overwhelming. Forge uses straightforward YAML/JSON configurations that are easier to version control and understand.
Bottom Line: If you're tired of Java's memory bloat and complexity, Forge offers a modern, lightweight alternative with better IaC support and faster performance.
Forge vs GitLab CI
Why Forge is better than GitLab CI for automation workflows
| Feature | Forge | GitLab CI |
|---|---|---|
| Has FOSS version | ✅ YES | ✅ YES |
| Ease of setup and maintenance | ✅ YES | ❌ NO |
| Efficient use of CPU and RAM | ✅ YES, written in pure Go | ❌ NO, written in Ruby/Go hybrid |
| Can operate without Kubernetes, Docker, etc | ✅ YES, single binary or Docker | ⚠️ Requires PostgreSQL, Redis, etc |
| Purpose-built for automation | ✅ YES | ❌ NO (general CI/CD) |
| Can run Ansible playbooks | ✅ YES (native support) | ⚠️ Via CI jobs |
| Can run Terraform/OpenTofu code | ✅ YES | ✅ YES |
| Inventory Management | ✅ YES (built-in) | ❌ NO |
| Credential Management | ✅ YES (vault integration) | ⚠️ CI variables |
| Ad-hoc Task Execution | ✅ YES | ❌ NO |
| Installation size | ✅ ~50MB binary | ❌ Several GB |
| Terramate Orchestration | ✅ YES (integrated phases 1–6) | 🤷 Unknown |
| Terraformer Integration | ✅ YES | 🤷 Unknown |
| Packer/QEMU Support | ✅ YES (image build & VM test) | 🤷 Unknown |
| Official Docker Images | ✅ Forge & Runners | 🤷 Unknown |
| DoD SCC Integration | ✅ YES | 🤷 Unknown |
| OpenSCAP Remote Runner | ✅ YES | 🤷 Unknown |
| STIG PDF/ZIP Exports | ✅ YES (reports & screenshots) | 🤷 Unknown |
Why Choose Forge Over GitLab CI?
1. Purpose-Built for Operations
GitLab CI is designed for application CI/CD pipelines. Forge is specifically built for infrastructure automation, configuration management, and operational tasks. It includes features like inventory management, credential vaults, and ad-hoc command execution that GitLab CI doesn't offer.
2. Much Simpler Setup
GitLab requires PostgreSQL, Redis, Gitaly, and often several GB of dependencies. Forge is a single binary - download and run, or deploy with Docker. Perfect for teams that need automation without the overhead of a full GitLab installation.
3. Native Ansible & Terraform Support
While you can run Ansible/Terraform in GitLab CI jobs, it's not the same as native support. Forge understands Ansible inventories, playbooks, roles, and Terraform modules natively, providing better visibility and control.
4. No Git Repository Required
GitLab CI requires everything to be in Git repositories with .gitlab-ci.yml files. Forge can work with Git, but also supports local playbooks, on-the-fly execution, and other workflows.
5. Lower Resource Requirements
GitLab is notoriously resource-hungry, often requiring 4GB+ RAM. Forge runs comfortably in 512MB, making it suitable for smaller environments and edge deployments.
6. Better for Operations Teams
If you're primarily doing infrastructure automation, server configuration, and operational tasks (not application CI/CD), Forge provides a more focused and efficient solution.
Use GitLab CI for: Application development pipelines, source code management, and integrated DevOps platform needs.
Use Forge for: Infrastructure automation, configuration management, Ansible/Terraform workflows, and operational task execution.
Forge vs Jenkins
Why Forge is better than Jenkins for automation
| Feature | Forge | Jenkins |
|---|---|---|
| Has FOSS version | ✅ YES | ✅ YES |
| Ease of setup and maintenance | ✅ YES | ❌ NO |
| Efficient use of CPU and RAM | ✅ YES, written in pure Go | ❌ NO, written in Java |
| Can operate without Kubernetes, Docker, Java, etc | ✅ YES, single binary or Docker | ❌ NO, requires Java |
| Can run Ansible playbooks | ✅ YES (native) | ⚠️ Via plugins |
| Can run Terraform/OpenTofu code | ✅ YES | ⚠️ Via plugins |
| Can run Bash scripts | ✅ YES | ✅ YES |
| Support remote runners | ✅ YES | ⚠️ YES (complex setup) |
| Modern UI | ✅ YES (Vue.js) | ❌ NO (dated UI) |
| Secure by default | ✅ YES | ❌ NO (requires hardening) |
| Plugin management complexity | ✅ Built-in features | ❌ Plugin hell |
| Terramate Orchestration | ✅ YES (integrated phases 1–6) | 🤷 Unknown |
| Terraformer Integration | ✅ YES | 🤷 Unknown |
| Packer/QEMU Support | ✅ YES (image build & VM test) | 🤷 Unknown |
| Official Docker Images | ✅ Forge & Runners | 🤷 Unknown |
| DoD SCC Integration | ✅ YES | 🤷 Unknown |
| OpenSCAP Remote Runner | ✅ YES | 🤷 Unknown |
| STIG PDF/ZIP Exports | ✅ YES (reports & screenshots) | 🤷 Unknown |
Why Choose Forge Over Jenkins?
1. Escape Plugin Hell
Jenkins requires dozens of plugins for basic functionality, leading to version conflicts, security vulnerabilities, and maintenance nightmares. Forge has everything built-in - no plugins needed for Ansible, Terraform, or remote execution.
2. Modern, Secure Design
Jenkins has a long history of security issues due to its age and plugin ecosystem. Forge is built with modern security practices from the ground up, including secure defaults, rate limiting, and comprehensive audit logging.
3. No Java Required
Jenkins requires Java and has the typical JVM overhead (slow startup, high memory usage). Forge is a single Go binary that starts instantly and uses minimal resources.
4. Better User Experience
Jenkins' UI hasn't changed much in a decade and feels outdated. Forge has a modern Vue.js interface with responsive design and better usability.
5. Configuration as Code (Done Right)
While Jenkins added "Configuration as Code" later via plugins, Forge is built around this concept. Templates, inventories, and projects are all version-controlled YAML/JSON.
6. Purpose-Built for IaC
Jenkins is a general-purpose automation server that can do everything (but nothing exceptionally well). Forge is laser-focused on infrastructure automation with native support for Ansible and Terraform.
Bottom Line: Jenkins is showing its age. If you're primarily doing infrastructure automation rather than application CI/CD, Forge offers a modern, lightweight, and more secure alternative without the plugin complexity.
Forge vs Spacelift
Why Forge is better than Spacelift
| Feature | Forge | Spacelift |
|---|---|---|
| Has FOSS version | ✅ YES | ❌ NO |
| Fully on-premises | ✅ YES | ❌ NO (SaaS only) |
| Ease of setup and maintenance | ✅ YES | ⚠️ Requires internet access |
| Efficient use of CPU and RAM | ✅ YES, written in pure Go | 🤷 Cloud-based |
| Can operate without cloud connectivity | ✅ YES, single binary or Docker | ❌ NO (SaaS only) |
| Can run Ansible playbooks | ✅ YES | ❌ NO |
| Can run Terraform/OpenTofu code | ✅ YES | ✅ YES |
| Can run Bash scripts | ✅ YES | ⚠️ Limited |
| Support remote runners | ✅ YES | ⚠️ Private workers (extra cost) |
| Data sovereignty | ✅ Complete control | ❌ Data in cloud |
| Air-gapped environments | ✅ YES | ❌ NO |
| Terramate Orchestration | ✅ YES (integrated phases 1–4) | 🤷 Unknown |
| Terraformer Integration | ✅ YES | 🤷 Unknown |
| Packer/QEMU Support | ✅ YES (image build & VM test) | 🤷 Unknown |
| Official Docker Images | ✅ Forge & Runners | ❌ NO (SaaS only) |
| Golden Image Catalog | ✅ YES (Packer builds, catalog, Terraform var injection) | 🤷 Unknown |
| DoD SCC Integration | ✅ YES | 🤷 Unknown |
| OpenSCAP Remote Runner | ✅ YES | 🤷 Unknown |
| STIG PDF/ZIP Exports | ✅ YES (reports & screenshots) | 🤷 Unknown |
Why Choose Forge Over Spacelift?
1. Own Your Infrastructure
Spacelift is SaaS-only, meaning your infrastructure state and secrets live in someone else's cloud. Forge runs on-premises, giving you complete control over your data, compliance, and security.
2. Complete Control
Spacelift is a SaaS platform where your infrastructure state lives in their cloud. Forge is MIT licensed and runs on your infrastructure, whether you're managing 10 servers or 10,000.
3. Works in Air-Gapped Environments
Many regulated industries (finance, defense, healthcare) require air-gapped networks. Spacelift cannot work in these environments. Forge works anywhere - no internet required.
4. Multi-Tool Support
Spacelift focuses solely on Terraform/Terragrunt. Forge supports Terraform, Ansible, Bash scripts, OpenTofu, and more. One tool for all your automation needs.
5. No Vendor Lock-in
Once you build workflows in Spacelift, you're locked in. Forge uses standard Ansible playbooks, Terraform modules, and Git repositories that work with any tool.
6. Data Sovereignty & Compliance
For organizations with strict data residency requirements, Spacelift's cloud-only model is a non-starter. Forge keeps everything under your control.
Perfect for: Organizations requiring on-premises deployment, air-gapped environments, multi-tool automation (Ansible + Terraform), or complete data sovereignty.
Forge vs SteelCloud ConfigOS
Compliance Automation vs Commercial STIG Hardening
Both Digital Data Forge and SteelCloud ConfigOS address security compliance and automation, but they take fundamentally different approaches.
Digital Data Forge is an automation platform with built-in compliance scanning, compliance dashboard, and commercial support options, while SteelCloud ConfigOS is a commercial solution focused specifically on DISA STIG hardening and remediation.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Forge | SteelCloud ConfigOS |
|---|---|---|
| MIT Licensed | ✅ YES (full source available) | ❌ NO (proprietary) |
| Deployment Model | ✅ Self-hosted, single binary or Docker | ⚠️ Agent-based or agentless |
| Docker Support | ✅ YES (optional deployment) | ⚠️ Unknown |
| Compliance Scanning | ✅ YES | ✅ YES (DISA STIG focused) |
| Automated Remediation | ✅ YES (via Ansible playbooks) | ✅ YES (built-in STIG remediation) |
| DISA STIG Support | ✅ YES | ✅ YES (primary focus) |
| CIS Benchmarks | ✅ YES | ✅ YES |
| Custom Policies | ✅ YES | ⚠️ Limited to ConfigOS framework |
| Multi-Tool Support | ✅ YES (Ansible, Terraform, Bash, PowerShell) | ❌ NO (compliance only) |
| Ansible Integration | ✅ Native Ansible support | ❌ NO |
| Terraform/IaC Support | ✅ YES (Terraform, OpenTofu) | ❌ NO |
| Compliance Dashboard | ✅ YES (Project, Task, User reporting) | ✅ YES |
| Built-in STIG Viewer | ✅ YES | ⚠️ Unknown |
| IaC Review & Compliance Alignment | ✅ YES (Review, edit, framework alignment) | ❌ NO |
| OOTB Compliance Templates | ✅ YES (DoD STIGs, CIS, HIPAA) | ✅ YES (STIG focused) |
| HIPAA Compliance | ✅ YES (Automated OOTB) | ❌ NO |
| Secret Manager Integrations | ✅ YES (Vault, Ansible Vault, Azure, AWS, GCP) | ⚠️ Unknown |
| API Support | ✅ YES (full REST API) | ⚠️ Limited API |
| Scheduled Scans | ✅ YES | ✅ YES |
| Report Formats | ✅ ARF, HTML, CSV | ✅ Multiple formats |
| LDAP/AD Integration | ✅ YES | ✅ YES |
| RBAC (Role-Based Access) | ✅ YES | ✅ YES |
| Multi-OS Support | ✅ Linux, Windows (via runners) | ✅ RHEL, Windows Server |
| Cloud Support | ✅ AWS, Azure, GCP (via Terraform) | ⚠️ Limited cloud support |
| Air-gapped Environments | ✅ YES | ✅ YES |
| Resource Requirements | ✅ Low (512MB+ RAM) | ⚠️ Moderate |
| Setup Complexity | ✅ Simple (single binary or Docker) | ⚠️ Requires commercial setup |
| Learning Curve | ⚠️ Moderate (Ansible knowledge helpful) | ⚠️ Moderate (STIG expertise needed) |
| Community Support | ✅ Active community | ⚠️ Commercial support only |
| Vendor Lock-in | ✅ NONE (MIT licensed, standard tools) | ❌ HIGH (proprietary solution) |
| Terramate Orchestration | ✅ YES (integrated phases 1–4) | 🤷 Unknown |
| Terraformer Integration | ✅ YES | 🤷 Unknown |
| Packer/QEMU Support | ✅ YES (image build & VM test) | 🤷 Unknown |
| Official Docker Images | ✅ Forge & Runners | 🤷 Unknown |
| DoD SCC Integration | ✅ YES | 🤷 Unknown |
| OpenSCAP Remote Runner | ✅ YES | 🤷 Unknown |
| STIG PDF/ZIP Exports | ✅ YES (reports & screenshots) | 🤷 Unknown |
Detailed Comparison
1. Compliance Capabilities
Forge: Comprehensive Compliance Suite
Digital Data Forge provides a complete compliance platform with advanced features:
- Built-in STIG Viewer: View and analyze Security Technical Implementation Guides directly in the platform
- Compliance Dashboard: Real-time reporting with Project, Task, and User-level compliance metrics
- OOTB Templates: Pre-built automated compliance for DoD STIGs, CIS Benchmarks, and HIPAA
- IaC Compliance: Review, edit, and align Infrastructure as Code (Terraform, Ansible) with compliance frameworks
- Framework Integration: Native integration with OpenSCAP and other compliance frameworks
- DISA STIGs: Complete support for all RHEL/CentOS/Ubuntu/Windows STIGs
- CIS Benchmarks: Full support for industry-standard CIS configurations
- HIPAA Compliance: Automated HIPAA compliance scanning and reporting
- Remediation: Ansible's extensive module library for automated remediation
- Secret Management: Native integrations with HashiCorp Vault, Ansible Vault, Azure Key Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, GCP Secret Manager
- Reporting: Comprehensive reports, HTML dashboards, CSV exports, audit trails
- Flexibility: Not limited to compliance - full automation platform
SteelCloud ConfigOS: Purpose-Built STIG Hardening
ConfigOS is specifically designed for DISA STIG compliance with automated remediation:
- STIG Focus: Deep STIG expertise and automated remediation
- Windows Support: Strong Windows STIG support
- Fast Scanning: Optimized for rapid compliance checks
- Automated Fixes: One-click STIG remediation (within scope)
- Reporting: DoD/Federal compliance reporting
- Limitation: Only does compliance - no general automation
2. Automation & Flexibility
Forge: Universal Automation Platform
Forge is not just a compliance tool - it's a complete automation platform:
- Ansible: Full native Ansible playbook support
- Terraform/OpenTofu: Infrastructure as Code management
- Bash Scripts: Run any shell scripts
- PowerShell: Windows automation support
- Custom Tasks: Create any workflow you need
- Scheduling: Cron-based task scheduling
- Inventory Management: Dynamic inventory support
- Secret Management: Vault integration for credentials
SteelCloud ConfigOS: Compliance Only
ConfigOS is focused solely on compliance scanning and hardening:
- Purpose-Built: STIG hardening only
- Limited Scope: Cannot be used for general automation
- No IaC Support: Doesn't support Terraform or other IaC tools
- No Ansible: No Ansible integration
🎯 Key Insight: One Tool vs. Multiple Tools
With Forge, you get compliance scanning AND general automation in one platform. With ConfigOS, you need ConfigOS for compliance, then Ansible/Terraform/etc for automation - managing multiple tools, licenses, and integrations.
3. Use Cases & Best Fit
✅ Choose Forge If You Need:
- Built-in STIG Viewer: Direct access to Security Technical Implementation Guides in the UI
- Compliance Dashboard: Real-time Project, Task, and User-level compliance reporting
- IaC Compliance: Review, edit, and align Infrastructure as Code with compliance frameworks
- OOTB Compliance: Pre-built templates for DoD STIGs, CIS Benchmarks, and HIPAA
- Multi-Framework: Integration with OpenSCAP and other compliance frameworks
- Secret Management: Native integrations with Vault, Azure, AWS, GCP secret managers
- Flexibility: Compliance + general automation in one tool
- MIT Licensed: Full source code access for auditing/customization
- Multi-Tool Support: Ansible, Terraform, Bash, PowerShell in one platform
- No Vendor Lock-in: Standard tools and formats
- Cloud & On-Prem: Works anywhere, including air-gapped
- Commercial Support: Community and commercial support options
⚠️ Choose ConfigOS If You Need:
- Windows STIG Expertise: Deep Windows STIG hardening (though Forge can do this too with Ansible)
- Vendor Support: Prefer established vendor support contract
- DoD/Federal Pedigree: Vendor with established DoD presence
- Compliance Only: Only need compliance, not general automation
Bottom Line: Forge is MIT licensed and provides comprehensive compliance capabilities plus general automation in one platform. Choose Forge if you need compliance dashboard, STIG viewer, IaC compliance alignment, multi-tool support, and no vendor lock-in.